Law Commission Discussion Forum
This discussion forum is now closed
In our consultation paper we concluded that the law relating to the admissibility of expert evidence is in need of reform. We have made a number of proposals which we believe will go some way towards rectifying the problems we identify in the consultation paper.
Latest Discussions
| Topic — | Posts | Last Poster | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|
| [closed] Difficulties with proposed judicial screening of expert evidence | 4 | bodriche | 1 year |
| [closed] Admissibility of Scientific Evidence - some after thoughts | 1 | gilsonc | 1 year |
| [closed] Admissibility of Scientific Evidence in Criminal Proceedings | 1 | gilsonc | 1 year |
| [closed] 1-12 Admissibility requirements | 1 | GEOFFT | 1 year |
| [closed] Your examples of unreliable expert evidence | 6 | 1 year | |
| [closed] filtering unreliable witnesses as well as unreliable science | 1 | Laura Hoyano | 1 year |
| [closed] Report of the Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario | 1 | david.ranson | 1 year |
| [closed] ISO/UKAS accreditation is inappropriate | 1 | Dr. Wilson | 1 year |
| Forum | Topics | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Expert Evidence In Criminal Proceedings – This forum used to discuss the Expert Evidence consultation is now closed | 8 | 16 |